Les Misérables Actors Record Live On Set

The past decade has been surprisingly fruitful and varied for Hollywood musicals. Rob Marshall’s Chicago kicked off the the trend with a uniquely effective re-imagining of the classic play, fit with fantastic performances and a sublimely integrated plot structure. The ball has kept rolling with such films as the throwback cartooning of The Producers, the ballad-ridden darkness of Phantom of the Opera, the bizarre whimsy of Sweeney Todd, the clever but uneven Nine, the too mainstream RENT, and the inspired redo of Footloose. The responses to these pictures hasn’t necessarily been overly kind, but each  renders a different stylistic approach to their film’s fabrics, flexing the multitudes possible in the musical form. That said, no musical is yet to truly knock it out of the park (Chicago fans might think otherwise, of course).

That Tom Hooper will follow his Oscar win with a musical adaptation of Les Misérables has fans of the genre once again holding their breath for the breakthrough masterpiece they’ve been waiting for. I’ve been a bit skeptical about this project. While I do love musicals in general, I’m not thrilled about the source material and I don’t tend to be drawn to these types of Dickens-style period pieces. The pedigree of the creative team and the inclusion of an ever-underrated Anne Hathaway has me interested nonetheless.

A feature released today illuminates the challenging production approach taken by Hooper and his cast. Everybody sang live and in the moment, with the hope that this might bring an added level of authenticity to the material. Realism would be a breath of fresh air for a kind of film that could easily fall flat and stuffy.

Posted in Les Misérables, News | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Things Masculine: Eyes Wide Shut & The Master

“If you men only knew.” – Alice Harford, Eyes Wide Shut

The initial reaction to The Master has been a bit peculiar. I had expected it to be polarizing – the confrontational nature begs for push back – but nothing prepared me for the inspired, thought-provoked confusion experienced by many viewers. I’ve heard, “It was interesting, but I didn’t like it,” more this week than ever before in my life. It’s got me thinking of other films that have garnered such a response. The task is more difficult than one might expect, especially if considering that The Master is one of those rare cases where the qualms expressed by bored viewers actually matches some of the issues pronounced by stuffier, otherwise discerning, critics. The film certainly compels a great deal of thought, even from less-inclined-to-think audiences. But nobody seems to really LOVE it. The film in recent memory that reminds me most of The Master, in terms of tepid response, is the final film by one of Paul Thomas Anderson’s greatest influences, Eye Wide Shut. The more you put the two together, the more the likenesses of premise and approach come together as well.

Continue reading

Posted in Eyes Wide Shut, The Master, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Karen O’s Frankenweenie Tune

I have no idea what to expect from Tim Burton’s newest film, Frankenweenie. It’s not that it doesn’t interest me. His films in fact always have a way of pulling me in. It’s just that his work has a way of being so uneven – as both an overall canon and as individual pieces – that it’s virtually impossible to know what you’ll get. Somehow Burton’s films can feel grandiose while also stall or rehashed, with an aesthetic that he’s used over and over before.

What does interest me about this new endeavor is the involvement of Karen O’s song “Strange Love.” She has become an indie go-to-girl, adding both unique spice and cinematic overtones to films with darkness and edge. Her collaboration with Trent Reznor was something of a revelation when it appeared in the first teaser trailer for The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo:

Continue reading

Posted in Frankenweenie, News, Tim Burton | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Early Oscars 2013 Predictions

Well, almost every category… Every week (or so) from today until the Oscar Nominations are announced on Thursday, January 10, 2013, I will update predictions in every category of the Academy Awards. These are my best guesses based on my own assessments and buzz around the awards world.

Note: Films or people above the stars are my predictions as of today. These updates will also be on the sidebar.

Please check out the “Oscars” section for more detailed, in-progress write-ups about each award.

And now then:

Best Picture:
Argo
Silver Linings Playbook
The Master
Moonrise Kingdom
Lincoln
Les Misérables
Amour
***********
Django Unchained
Life of Pi
Beasts of the Southern Wild
Anna Karenina
Promised Land
The Impossible
Flight
Zero Dark Thirty

Continue reading

Posted in Oscar Talk, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Following Gets Criterion Treatment

Back before Christopher Nolan blossomed into a transcendent filmmaker, reaching gargantuan mainstream heights with slickly-made, highly intelligent action movies, he crafted a tiny neo-noir film called Following. Even though I have sincere respect for Nolan’s recent work, I am still partial to his early stuff. Following may well be my favorite.

Made on a shoe-string budget, shooting with 16mm reversal black & white stock, in a mostly guerrilla-style around the streets of London, Nolan weaves a simple story of moral bankruptcy, romance, seduction, and crime. Like his later films, it’s simply not enough to only spin a complex web of a plot. Nolan uses the tale of a man (played like a deer in headlights by Jeremy Theobald) stuck in a lonely obsession with following strangers to slowly unravel the moral compass of both his main character and humanity at large. While independently made, this film feels huge. It’s smart, but also wildly entertaining. Possibly due to the use of timeless, grainy photography or it’s non-linear structure, the film has aged quite well, unlike some other low-budget 90s films like Shallow Grave.

The Criterion Collection announced yesterday that they will release a restored version of Following to both Blu-ray and DVD. Not stacked with rare “making-of” features (though the “chronological rendering” has me a little giddy), the disc still looks to contain a number of enticing desserts for after the main course:

Continue reading

Posted in Christopher Nolan, Following, News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

SNL and a Whole World of Likes

http://www.hulu.com/watch/401540

In our ever-changing, technologically-absorbed world, there seems to be one constant: LIKE. Did you like the photo? Can you “like” my photo? I just didn’t like it. And, of course, “I, like, did like it.” In the season premiere of Saturday Night Live, one skit brought another proverbial “like” to the table. And this is absolutely, unquestionably, unarguably the worst “like” of them all. This is the wonderful: “I was like…” Could anything feel less uncomfortably self-conscious on the face this planet than slamming home the very essence of a long-winded story by starting the final sentence with “I was like…?” This very phrase threatens to be the death of us. All of us. Proposing a world where nobody is sure of anything, ever.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Lincoln Trailer Google Coup

Yesterday DreamWorks and the quintessential nerd-be-cool team of Steven Spielberg and Joseph Gordon-Levitt seemed to have broken new ground when they released the trailer for Lincoln on Google hangout. I suspect the idea was to have a purely interactive experience, to reach out to an audience who might otherwise miss the stuffy, Oscar-bait that is Lincoln, and say, “No, this film actually means something to YOU.”

A release of the trailer alone would be enough to set off the movie hounds on the internet, eagerly awaiting Daniel Day-Lewis’ transformation and the Speilbergian take on America’s most revered President. What Dreamworks intelligently identified is that appealing only to the film-snob masses would alienate the gads of suburban youth with money to burn from the 7-Eleven jobs they hold down on the weekend. For me, this felt like a desperate coup that spelled two very distinct realities, a) Spielberg is no longer the household name he once was and he’s insecure about it and b) major companies have officially submitted to the idea that appealing to the democratized taste of the internet might be the only way to salvage an extra $200 million in the box office.

Continue reading

Posted in Oscar Talk | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Best Actress 2013: Does Jennifer Lawrence Actually Stand a Chance?


The Academy can be a bit condescending towards lighter fair. Always the bridesmaid and never the bride, films like As Good As It GetsLost In TranslationBroadcast NewsThe Descendents, SidewaysJuno and so on, grab hordes of critical praise only to fizzle into obscurity a few months later. Do people even remember that Sideways was one of the best reviewed films of 2000s? In a year where Million Dollar Baby crept into a “weak” Oscar race, Sideways was somehow brushed aside as being over-hyped and frothy. Almost like clockwork, every year one film that targets the mature 30 to 50 demographic with, often waspy, comedic tropes appears and sucks in a ton of praise. By the time awards season barrels into Oscar night, these films have already left the building, never to be heard from again.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

A Brand Name Artist’s America

The Master: From its Norman Rockwell-like wealth of colors, ones that run the gauntlet of the spectrum without playing favorites, to it’s sense of control and over-branded capitalism, The Master feels every bit like a slice of America. Albeit, this isn’t the America Rockwell was promoting, at least not on the intended surface. This is a far more cynical examination of normal men living within a culture that purports to be democratized by the “Will of God.” Every human is born to follow while also born with the urge to fight back. It’s this opposing force that constitutes much of the internal turmoil suffered by humans throughout their daily lives. From this struggle, Paul Thomas Anderson’s film takes it’s lead. Everything whirls hypnotically, as if forming inside a furious maelstrom, all building around the idea of whether one man can control that which is unwieldy and whether that which is unwieldy is ever truly lacking control. The film begs the question: Are we simply animals blessed with the ability to reason ourselves into an oppressed calm that poses as happiness?

Freddie Quell has just returned from duty at the end of World War I. He seems aloof and searching, with a penchant for violent outbursts. Without knowing his motives, we watch as he takes a job as a portrait photographer then as a farmhand in Salinas. Both occupations end with Freddie being chased away, back into the judgmental world. One night Freddie comes upon a party boat where The Master, Lancaster Dodd, entertains a group of followers for his “cause.” Freddie immediately interests Dodd and becomes something of a protégé, or at least an experiment. Freddie represents the most complex threat to the theory of controlled perfection that Dodd and his people promote. As the film progresses, mostly in moments of suffocating tension between Quell and Dodd, we begin to see that little truth informs Dodd’s method, only that he understands humans mostly need to be lead. He believes himself the kind of charismatic leader able to instill a strong way of life on these followers. Freddie initially resists the indoctrination into the group then falls for it until finally leaving for good. Therein lay the essay-like structure of this most challenging film; a probing study of whether man has been put on Earth to defy their animalistic urges in a rigid order or if true freedom comes from an unrestrained tackling of life.

Continue reading

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

D.A. Pennebaker to Receive Honorary Oscar

Perhaps the Academy took a step closer to taking non-fiction films seriously on a larger scale today. Legendary filmmaker, D.A. Pennebaker, creator of such films as Dont Look Back, War Room, and Monterey Pop will be the first documentarian ever awarded an Honarary Oscar.

I’ve always been moved by Pennebaker’s ability to transmit the feeling of a moment with the way he films it. Sometimes through the editing and sometimes through the framing, he possesses a preternatural patience for letting moments unfold exactly as it should to maximize its effect. I think of Janis Joplin’s obscured face as she belts “Ball and Chain” in front of an entranced festival crowd. Another filmmaker might’ve shot this in a straight-on close-up. For Pennebaker, Joplin’s partially masked face spoke to her inner psyche – one of mature pain and youthful energy – and forced the viewer to want to reach into the screen to be a part of the reality. I’d argue no other documentary filmmaker has been more consistently effective at turning the smallest, subtlest of moments into a touching experience on screen.

There’s so many memorable moments Pennebaker has captured, but the one that always sticks with me is from Dont Look Back. Two men, Dylan and Donovan, each at the heights of their careers, sing to each other in a cramped hotel room. Somehow the understanding that we are watching a genius in Bob Dylan and a passing talent in Donovan transcends the action on screen like no subtextual dialogue any screenwriter could conceive. Watch Dylan right before he blows Donovan away with his rendition of the aptly named, “It’s All Over Now, Baby Blue.”

Posted in Oscar Talk, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment