Oscar Predictions: Best Documentary Feature

Best Documentary Feature Nominees:
Searching for Sugar Man (dir. Malik Bendjelloul)
How to Survive a Plague (dir. David France)
The Invisible War (dir. Kirby Dick)
5 Broken Cameras (dir. Emad Burnat, Guy Davidi)
The Gatekeepers (dir. Dror Moreh)

searchingforsugarman

Almost all of the categories are difficult this year, but Best Documentary poses a particularly interesting dilemma. You can usually count on one film being a crowd favorite amongst a list of other more confrontational, political, or otherwise trying films. Last year Undefeated was, in hindsight, the obvious choice for this reason. This year, the bulk of the material falls in the latter category with only one – Searching for Sugar Man – seeming to be the former. Yet, even Sugar Man seems too narrow to take the prize. In reality, each of these film has a legitimate shot to win.

Searching for Sugar Man tells a fairly focused story about a mysterious musician named Rodriguez, who, after seeing his career fizzle out before it became much of a career at all, unknowingly turns into an inspiration for the South African revolution. The doc tells of a small group of South African’s quests to find Rodriguez. While Searching for Sugar Man is the current favorite, it lacks a certain emotional wallop that tends to draw non doc-watchers in. In some respects, the power of the picture is that it matches the easy going nature of its main subject. However, without a big picture issue to speak of, except perhaps a humble approach to poverty, the film might be seen as small. In it’s favor, the material here is safe, compelling, and almost impossible to dislike. Similar to likely Best Pic winner, Argo, the film has enough burning under the surface to be smart, but it’s not aggressive enough to rub people the wrong way.

Continue reading

Posted in Central Park Five, Documentary, Films, Movies, Oscar Talk, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Making the Animal Kingdom on Film

life-of-pi-image03

When Life of Pi wins the Best VFX Oscar next month, they should bring the animal consultants, researchers, and whoever else contributed to creating such textured behaviors, onto the stage with them. Besides the detail and design of the animals, the reactions and personality attributes are alarmingly spot-on. Watching the video below, I realized that not only has CGI evolved but working carefully to create realistically portrayals of animals is still very rare. Most times animals do not what they would actually do but what the writer/director thinks best serves the story. Life of Pi is a convincing film primarily because it avoids cheap emotion or sentimentality and because of how perfectly realized the animals are while inside an otherwise fantastical world.

Here’s another great video essay from Press Play. Here, creator Kevin Lee walks us through the almost 20 year history of CGI animals, from Babe’s primitive mouth movements to the extraordinary achievement of Life of Pi. Enjoy.

Posted in Films, Life of Pi, Movies, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Lubtisch Laughs

Another wonderful rare photo from The Criterion Collection. This time of Ernst Lubitsch on set with the accompanying quote, “At least twice a day the most dignified human being is ridiculous.”

Ernst Lubitsch

Posted in Criterion Collection, Films, Movies, News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

House of Cards About to Drop

netflix-house-of-cards

Something you rarely hear in regards to David Fincher is how his work has a way of existing inside a whirlpool, slowly spinning into an inevitably crushing revelation. The director’s early films, specifically Panic Room and The Game, were particularly apt at roping the viewer deep inside the narrative and controlling them through surprising twists and turns. Lately these moments have come in specific burst such as the Regatta Sequence in The Social Network and the matter of chance sequence in The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. What strikes me about House of Cards is how it seems to be a throwback to the director’s roots, again hypnotically lolling the audience into the shadows of contemporary politics.

Besides House of Cards being a groundbreaking event – for the first time an all digital-platform show will have the style, budget, and conceit of HBO and Showtime – but this project feature a filmmaker while he’s at the very top of his game. While feature directors turning to television is no longer rare, it is a treat to see such a hot director make the transition. As we can tell from the trailers, Fincher’s stamp will be all over this show. Make no mistake, this is a David Fincher experience through and through. Additionally, the show features a cast full of great actors overdue for a breakout success. Steven Soderbergh recently called the series, “The most beautiful thing you’ve seen on a screen.”

House of Cards lands only on Netflix this Friday, February 1st with 13 full episodes.

Posted in David Fincher, House of Cards, Netflix, Television, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Those Oscar Missed: Best Director

Stanley Kubrick Behind the Camera - H 2012

CONTRIBUTED BY JAKE THOMPSON

A director is vital to the making of a movie.  The director is responsible for getting the best possible performances from the actors.  The director is responsible for bringing his/her vision to life through his/her collaborations with the director of photography, writer(s), production designer, makeup designer, costume designer, and all of the other departments (unless he/she is simply a work-for-hire director brought in by the producers to just direct the actors, but even in that scenario a good director should still have some kind of vision for the film).  Every now and then, a director that turns in an extraordinary work gets snubbed by the Academy on the day the nominations are announced.  It didn’t take me very long to find five major snubs.

One major snub is Alfred Hitchcock for 1958’s Vertigo.  Hitchcock’s tale of tragic love and https://i0.wp.com/www.latimes.com/includes/projects/hollywood/portraits/alfred_hitchcock.jpgextreme obsession became one of the greatest movies ever made.  Hitchcock was able to get great performances from his actors (including James Stewart, Kim Novak, and Barbara Bel Geddes).  His choices for shot compositions and use of cinematography were creative and inspiring (not to mention effective).  It’s such a shame that he wasn’t nominated for his work here.  Hitchcock is a five-time nominee (5 Director nods for 1940’s Rebecca, 1944’s Lifeboat, 1945’s Spellbound, 1954’s Rear Window, and 1960’s Psycho).

Continue reading

Posted in Oscar Talk | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

REVIEW: The Last Stand

image

The most savvy choice director Kim Jee-woon made when approaching The Last Stand was to relegate Arnold Schwarzenegger’s comeback to the edges of the story. From a classic perspective the weight of the inevitable finale falls a little flat, seeing as our attachment to the hero is predicated on preconceived notions of the star, but in a strangely connected way, the overall effect of the film manages to ascend expectations of these types of blockbusters. Like a Pixar film, The Last Stand employs a rag tag group of disparate young lawmen and women to take down the world’s most feared drug smuggler. The group is lead by a sheriff with a hazy past filled with violence in the big city. And, yes, the film follows the exact path you might expect, even down to a “discard your firearms and fight with knuckles” ending. But The Last Stand engages by being surprisingly brisk along the way.

Arnold Schwarzenegger’s brand of charisma has always seemed to me rare and preternatural. Like James Dean or Marilyn Monroe, in his prime, Schwarzenegger, with his inflated jaw line unveiling full-faced grins and pulling off action hero jokiness, was imageborn to be watched. After a decade of inactivity and bad off-screen press, Arnold has lost his muscles, his charm, and a great deal of his staying power. The Last Stand, dealing in metaphors about a culture at the precipice of breaking under an influx of gun debates, liberalism, and immigration pressures, plays Schwarzenegger’s withering presence to perfect effect. Rounded out by a surprisingly strong cast, that includes the underused Luis Guzman and Johnny Knoxville, there’s a whimsical compliment to Schwarzenegger’s weariness. Similarly, the simplified writing clearly defines its bad guy, a conveniently able drug smuggler; again a metaphor for the increasingly unstoppable antagonism of creeping drug cartels. As far as analogies go, The Last Stand can be quite ambitious.

Continue reading

Posted in Films, Movies, Reviews, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Inside Llewyn Davis Trailer

Here is the trailer for the Coen Brothers’ upcoming, Inside Llewyn Davis. I’m cautiously optimistic about this one as I’ve found the Coens to actually be hit or miss throughout their careers. The hits, notably Fargo and Burning After Reading, are extremely watchable and subversive. However, I’ve tended to find some of their recently lauded work, specifically True Grit and A Serious Man, to be too cloying, conspicuous, and thin on substance.

The one major point of interest for this new one is the absence of longtime cinematographer, Roger Deakins. He’s filled in by no slouch in Amelie and Harry Potter DP, Bruno Delbonnel. From just the trailer shots, there does seem to be a discernible style difference.

Posted in Films, Movies, News, Trailers | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

REVIEW: Mama

image

Another curious entry into “January”-quality Hollywood horror fare, Mama dabbles in complex themes of motherhood but ultimately falls short on purpose and long on Visual Effects accompanied by auditory thrills. After a businessman named Jeffrey kills his wife and colleagues, he kidnaps his children and attempts to murder all of them by driving off a cliff. Instead, they live and retreat to a cabin in the woods where the spirit of Helvetia lives in a ghostly limbo. After disposing of Jeffrey, Helvetia (or Mama) takes care of the surviving children until they are discovered by Jeffrey’s brother, Lucas, and Lucas’ baby-fearing rocker girlfriend, Anabel. The plot turns to Anabel’s reluctant efforts to raise the now feral children, a process made more daunting by the persistent haunts of a volatile spirit that has engendered the trust of the girls.

Jessica Chastain, more layered here than in her lauded box office running mate, Zero Dark Thirty (and with more to chew on), plays a “modern” woman struggling to deny her biological needs of motherdom in an effort to keep up her dreams of rock stardom. Mama trips out of its first act by forcing Anabel to run two tracks: her apparent undeterred love for Lucas – something hardly earned – and her needs as an individual thinker. This confused dichotomy, combined with an extended opening that follows a rather convenient turn of events alluding to Wall Street corruption, makes the narrative tilt to Anabel difficult to maintain. Thus, the film relies on standard, if also particularly confusing, shock value in its mid-section.

Continue reading

Posted in 2013 Movies, Films, Movies, Reviews, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Those Oscar Missed: Best Actor

https://i0.wp.com/media.cinemasquid.com/blu-ray/titles/a-clockwork-orange/7dc27c23-d34a-42b2-b994-769fe1701ac9/screenshot-med-01.jpg

CONTRIBUTED BY JAKE THOMPSON

Best Actor can be a controversial category at times.  Sometimes a supporting performance will be submitted as a lead performance by the distributor either to help boost box office revenue or to increase the actor’s chances in that category for another film (because they think the actor has a better shot with the other film).  But most of the times, lead performances are nominated, but not every nominee truly deserved the nod.  Best Actor has a history of numerous major snubs; consequently I feel that listing just five major snubs is doing a disservice to all of those who were snubbed.  Nevertheless, I will name five major snubs, and I will also name five honorable mentions (rather than the usual three).

One immediate major snub is Humphrey Bogart for 1950’s In A Lonely Place.  He portrays Dixon Steele, a famous Hollywood screenwriter who has quite a bit of a temper and a dangerous past that’s hinted at throughout the film.  Bogart commands the screen every second he’s on it.  He manages to make such a difficult character sympathetic even when he’s suspected of murder (and all of the circumstantial evidence points to him).  It is truly a shame that he wasn’t nominated for such a strong performance.  Bogart is a three-time nominee (2 Actor nods for 1942’s Casablanca & 1954’s The Caine Mutiny, 1 Actor win for 1951’s The African Queen).

Continue reading

Posted in Oscar Talk | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Those Oscar Missed: Best Actress

https://yardsofgrapevine.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/a.jpeg?w=300

CONTRIBUTED BY JAKE THOMPSON

Best Actress, like, Best Actor, can be difficult to predict at times.  There’s also been some controversy regarding supporting performances being submitted for a lead performance award.  One example being Anne Baxter, who should’ve gotten a Supporting Actress nod but pushed for and got a Best Actress nod for 1950’s All About Eve.  Another example being Kate Winslet, who was submitted for Best Actress rather than Best Supporting Actress by the Weinsteins for 2008’s The Reader in order to boost box office numbers; what’s ironic is that Winslet would’ve won anyway for the film she should’ve been nominated for, 2008’s Revolutionary Road.  The Academy hasn’t always gotten the nominees right (they nominated Meryl Streep and Glenn Close last year; both appeared in terrible movies for which they were nominated)  Let’s take a look at some surprising major snubs.

One major snub is Rosalind Russell for 1940’s His Girl Friday.  Russell turns in a terrific performance as Hildy Johnson, a former star reporter who’s about to marry a bland insurance man and settle down in upstate NY.  Her ex-husband and current editor of “The Morning Post” convinces her to cover one last story involving the upcoming execution of a convicted murderer.  Russell stands toe-to-toe with co-star Cary Grant, keeping up with him during their rapid-fire dialogue sequences and showing everyone why she’s the strong woman that she is.  It’s such a shame that she wasn’t nominated for her work here.  Russell is a four-time nominee (4 Actress nods for 1942’s My Sister Eileen, 1946’s Sister Kenny, 1947’s Mourning Becomes Electra, and 1958’s Auntie Mame).

Continue reading

Posted in Oscar Talk | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment